Influence of Calcineurin Inhibitor Choice on Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients Aged ≥60 Y: A Collaborative Transplant Study Report.

BACKGROUND: Patients aged ≥60 y represent the fastest growing population among kidney transplant recipients and waitlist patients. They show an elevated infection risk and are frequently transplanted with multiple human leukocyte antigen mismatches. Whether the choice of calcineurin inhibitor influences graft survival, mortality, or key secondary outcomes such as infections in this vulnerable recipient population is unknown. METHODS: A total of 31 177 kidney transplants from deceased donors performed between 2000 and 2019 at European centers and reported to the Collaborative Transplant Study were analyzed using multivariable Cox and logistic regression analyses. All recipients were ≥60 y old and received tacrolimus (Tac) or cyclosporine A on an intention-to-treat basis, combined with mycophenolic acid or azathioprine plus/minus steroids. RESULTS: The risk of 3-y death-censored graft loss and patient mortality did not differ significantly between Tac- and cyclosporine A-treated patients (hazard ratio 0.98 and 0.95, P = 0.74 and 0.20, respectively). No difference was found in the overall risk of hospitalization for infection (hazard ratio = 0.95, P = 0.19); however, a lower incidence of rejection treatment (hazard ratio = 0.81, P < 0.001) was observed in Tac-treated patients. Assessment of pathogen-specific hospitalizations revealed no difference in the risk of hospitalization due to bacterial infection (odds ratio = 1.00, P = 0.96), but a significantly higher risk of hospitalization due to human polyomavirus infection was found among Tac-treated patients (odds ratio = 2.45, P = 0.002). The incidence of de novo diabetes was higher for Tac-based immunosuppression (odds ratio = 1.79, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Calcineurin inhibitor selection has no significant influence on death-censored graft survival, mortality, and overall infection risk in ≥60-y-old kidney transplant recipients.

Circulating anti-human leukocyte antigen IgM antibodies as a potential early predictor of allograft rejection and a negative clinical outcome after lung transplantation.

PURPOSE: Anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) immunoglobulin (Ig) M production stimulated by an alloantigen is sensitive, making IgM a novel potential marker of allorejection after organ transplantation. This study examined the relationship between the serum levels of anti-HLA IgM early after clinical lung transplantation (LTx) and the post-transplant outcomes. METHODS: Thirty-one consecutive patients who underwent deceased LTx were included. Immunoreactivity against HLA was retrospectively analyzed by measuring the anti-HLA IgM levels in the serum sampled for the first 14 days after LTx. The flow panel reactive antibody technique was used. The ratio of the anti-class I IgM level at each day to baseline was obtained, and the peak IgM level was determined for each case. The correlation between the peak IgM level and subsequent development of acute rejection (AR), chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), and survival outcomes were examined. RESULTS: The peak IgM level was a significant risk factor for AR within 90 days in univariate and multivariate analyses. In the long term, the patients with positive IgM (peak level > 1.8) tended to have a poorer CLAD-free and overall survival than those with negative IgM. CONCLUSION: Elevation of anti-HLA IgM levels early after LTx may be correlated with a higher incidence of rejection and negative clinical outcomes.

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a viable option as a bridge to heart transplant.

OBJECTIVE: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a rescue therapy for patients in cardiogenic shock. We hypothesize that patients bridged to heart transplant with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation have decreased survival. METHODS: The United Network of Organ Sharing database was retrospectively reviewed from January 1, 1999, to March 31, 2018, for heart transplant recipients. Recipients bridged with any form of mechanical support and those without support were compared with recipients bridged with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The primary end point was restricted mean survival time through 16.7 years. RESULTS: Of 26,918 recipients, 15,076 required no pretransplant mechanical support (56.0%). Support patients included 9321 with left ventricular assist devices (34.6%), 53 with right ventricular assist devices (0.2%), 258 with total artificial hearts (1.0%), 686 with biventricular assist devices (2.6%), 1378 with intra-aortic balloon pumps (5.1%), and 146 who required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (0.5%). In the first 16.7 years post-transplant, compared with recipients bridged with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, estimated adjusted restricted mean survival time was higher in patients who required no mechanical support (16.6 months [14.0-19.4]) and patients with a left ventricular assist device (16.5 months [99% confidence interval, 13.9-19.2]), an intra-aortic balloon pump (11.2 months [8.3-14.7]), or a biventricular assist device (6.6 months [3.6-10.3]). Restricted mean survival time in patients with a right ventricular assist device or a total artificial heart was similar to patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. CONCLUSIONS: Recipients bridged with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were estimated to survive 16.6 months less than nonmechanical circulatory support recipients. Bridge to heart transplant with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a viable option, and these patients should be considered transplant candidates.

Outcomes after heart retransplantation: A 50-year single-center experience.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate outcomes after heart retransplantation. METHODS: From January 6, 1968, to June 2019, 123 patients (112 adult and 11 pediatric patients) underwent heart retransplantation, and 2092 received primary transplantation at our institution. Propensity-score matching was used to account for baseline differences between the retransplantation and the primary transplantation-only groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed. The primary end point was all-cause mortality, and secondary end points were postoperative complications. RESULTS: Retransplantation recipient age was 39.6 ± 16.4 years, and donor age was 26.4 ± 11.2 years. Ninety-two recipients (74.8%) were male. Compared with recipients who only underwent primary heart transplantation, retransplantation recipients were more likely to have hypertension (44/73.3% vs 774/53.3%, P = .0022), hyperlipidemia (40/66.7% vs 447/30.7%, P < .0001), and require dialysis (7/11.7% vs 42/2.9%, P = .0025). The indications for heart retransplantation were cardiac allograft vasculopathy (32/80%), primary graft dysfunction (6/15%), and refractory acute rejection (2/5%). After matching, postoperative outcomes such as hospital length of stay, severe primary graft dysfunction requiring intra-aortic balloon pump or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, cerebral vascular accident, respiratory failure, renal failure requiring dialysis, and infection were similar between the 2 groups. Matched median survival after retransplantation was 4.6 years compared with 6.5 years after primary heart transplantation (log-rank P = .36, stratified log-rank P = .0063). CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center cohort, the unadjusted long-term survival after heart retransplantation was inferior to that after primary heart transplantation, and short-term survival difference persisted after propensity-score matching. Heart retransplantation should be considered for select patients for optimal donor organ usage.

Disease progression in patients with the restrictive and mixed phenotype of Chronic Lung Allograft dysfunction-A retrospective analysis in five European centers to assess the feasibility of a therapeutic trial.

BACKGROUND: Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction (CLAD) is a major obstacle for long term survival after lung transplantation (LTx). Besides Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome, two other phenotypes of CLAD, restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS) and mixed phenotype, have been described. Trials to test in these conditions are desperately needed and analyzing natural outcome to plan such trials is essential. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of functional outcome in bilateral LTx recipients with RAS and mixed phenotype, transplanted between 2009 and 2018 in five large European centers with follow- up spirometry up to 12 months after diagnosis. Based on these data, sample size and power calculations for randomized therapeutic trial was estimated using two imputation methods for missing values. RESULTS: Seventy patients were included (39 RAS and 31 mixed phenotype), median 3.1 years after LTx when CLAD was diagnosed. Eight, 13 and 25 patients died within 6, 9 and 12 months after diagnosis and a two patients underwent re-transplantation within 12 months leading to a graft survival of 89, 79 and 61% six, nine and 12 months after diagnosis, respectively. Observed FEV1 decline was 451 ml at 6 months and stabilized at 9 and 12 months, while FVC showed continuous decline. Using two methods of imputation, a progressive further decline after 6 months for FEV1 was noted. CONCLUSION: The poor outcome of these two specific CLAD phenotypes suggests the urgent need for future therapeutic randomized trials. The number of missing values in a potential trial seems to be high and most frequently attributed to death. Survival may be used as an endpoint in clinical trials in these distinct phenotypes and imputation techniques are relevant if graft function is used as a surrogate of disease progression in future trials.

Time-dependent blood eosinophilia count increases the risk of kidney allograft rejection.

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence suggest that type 2 immune effectors play a role in solid organ transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of blood count eosinophils (BCEo) on immunological outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with stable graft function after 3 months post-transplant. METHOD: We performed cause-specific Cox model considering BCEo, the use of calcineurin inhibitors and systemic corticoids as time-dependent explicative variables on a prospective cohort of 1013 kidney transplant patients who experienced kidney allograft rejection and/or the appearance of de novo donor specific antibodies after excluding common causes of increased BCEo.. FINDINGS: BCEo ≥ 0.3 G/L was associated with a 3-fold increased risk of rejection independent of immunosuppressive regimen after 3 months post-transplant in patients without pre-transplant DSAs and with CNI-based immunosuppression. No association between BCEo either with donor specific antibodies or graft survival was noticed. INTERPRETATION: These observations in this large cohort support the hypothesis of eosinophils in allo-immunity in human and claim for further mechanistic research. FUNDING: This study was supported by the French National Research Agency, The "Institut de Recherche en Santé Respiratoire des Pays de la Loire" and the University hospital of Nantes.

Outcomes and factors leading to graft failure in kidney transplants from deceased donors with acute kidney injury-A retrospective cohort study.

Due to shortage of donor, kidney transplants (KTs) from donors with acute kidney injury (AKI) are expanding. Although previous studies comparing clinical outcomes between AKI and non-AKI donors in KTs have shown comparable results, data on high-volume analysis of KTs outcomes with AKI donors are limited. This study aimed to analyze the selection trends of AKI donors and investigate the impact of AKI on graft failure using the United states cohort data. We analyzed a total 52,757 KTs collected in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipient (SRTR) from 2010 to 2015. The sample included 4,962 (9.4%) cases of KTs with AKI donors (creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dL). Clinical characteristics of AKI and non-AKI donors were analyzed and outcomes of both groups were compared. We also analyzed risk factors for graft failure in AKI donor KTs. Although the incidence of delayed graft function was higher in recipients of AKI donors compared to non-AKI donors, graft and patient survival were not significantly different between the two groups. We found donor hypertension, cold ischemic time, the proportion of African American donors, and high KDPI were risk factors for graft failure in AKI donor KTs. KTs from deceased donor with AKI showed comparable outcomes. Thus, donors with AKI need to be considered more actively to expand donor pool. Caution is still needed when donors have additional risk factors of graft failure.

Expression of MICA in Zero Hour Biopsies Predicts Graft Survival After Liver Transplantation.

In search for novel biomarkers to assess graft quality, we investigated whether defined candidate genes are predictive for outcome after liver transplantation (LT). Zero-hour liver biopsies were obtained from 88 livers. Gene expression of selected candidate markers was analyzed and correlated with clinical parameters as well as short and long-term outcomes post LT. Whereas both, the calculated Eurotransplant Donor-Risk-Index and the donor body mass index, had either a poor or no predictive value concerning serum levels indicative for liver function (ALT, AST, GGT, bilirubin) after 6 months, chronological donor age was weakly predictive for serum bilirubin (AUC=0.67). In contrast, the major histcompatibility complex class I related chain A (MICA) mRNA expression demonstrated a high predictive value for serum liver function parameters revealing an inverse correlation (e.g. for ALT: 3 months p=0.0332; 6 months p=0.007, 12 months 0.0256, 24 months p=0.0098, 36 months, p=0.0153) and proved significant also in a multivariate regression model. Importantly, high expression of MICA mRNA revealed to be associated with prolonged graft survival (p=0.024; log rank test) after 10 years of observation, whereas low expression was associated with the occurrence of death in patients with transplant related mortality (p=0.031). Given the observed correlation with short and long-term graft function, we suggest MICA as a biomarker for pre-transplant graft evaluation.

Bronchoalveolar lavage cytokine-based risk stratification of minimal acute rejection in clinically stable lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Acute cellular rejection (ACR) remains the most significant risk factor for chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). While clinically significant or higher-grade (≥A2) ACR is generally treated with augmented immunosuppression (IS), the management of clinically stable grade A1 ACR remains controversial. At our center, patients with clinically stable grade A1 ACR are routinely not treated with augmented IS. While the overall outcomes in this group of patients at our center are equivalent to patients with stable A0 pathology, CLAD and death rates remain overall high. We hypothesized that a distinct cytokine signature at the time of early minimal rejection state would be associated with worse outcomes. Specifically, we aimed to determine whether bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) biomarkers at the time of first clinically stable grade A1 ACR (CSA1R) are predictive of subsequent CLAD or death. METHODS: Among all adult, bilateral, first lung transplants, performed 2010-2016, transbronchial biopsies obtained within the first-year post-transplant were categorized as clinically stable or unstable based on the presence or absence of ≥10% concurrent drop in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). We assessed BAL samples obtained at the time of CSA1R episodes, which were not preceded by another ACR (i.e., first episodes). Twenty-one proteins previously associated with ACR or CLAD were measured in the BAL using a multiplex bead assay. Association between protein levels and subsequent CLAD or death was assessed using Cox Proportional Hazards models, adjusted for relevant peri-transplant clinical covariates. RESULTS: We identified 75 patients with first CSA1R occurring at a median time of 98 days (range 48.5-197) post-transplant. Median time from transplant to CLAD or death was 1247 (756.5-1921.5) and 1641 days (1024.5-2326.5), respectively. In multivariable models, levels of MCP1/CCL2, S100A8, IL10, TNF-receptor 1, and pentraxin 3 (PTX3) were associated with both CLAD development and death (p < 0.05 for all). PTX3 remained significantly associated with both CLAD and death after adjusting for multiple comparisons. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that a focused BAL protein signature, with PTX3 having the strongest association, may be useful in determining a subset of CSA1R patients at increased risk and may benefit from a more aggressive management strategy.

Effect of Donor and Recipient ABH-Secretor Status on ABO-Incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation.

Introduction: ABO blood group antigens within grafts are continuously exposed to anti-A/B antibodies in the serum of recipients after ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation and are instrumental in antibody-mediated rejection. Some individuals secrete soluble blood group antigens into body fluids. In this study, we investigated the effect of donor and recipient secretor status on the outcomes of ABOi kidney transplantation. Methods: Data of a total of 32 patients with ABOi living donor kidney transplantation were retrospectively collected between 2014 and 2020 in West China Hospital. The genotype and phenotype of both donors and recipients were examined and evaluated with post-transplantation anti-A/B titer changes, graft function, and rejection. Results: Of the 32 recipients and 32 donors, 23 (71.9%) recipients and 27 (84.4%) donors had secretor genotypes, whereas 9 (28.1%) recipients and 5 (15.6%) donors did not. Anti-A/B titers after ABOi kidney transplantation were not significantly influenced by the secretor status of either donors or recipients. The post-transplantation serum creatinine (Scr) levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was better in weak- or non-secretor recipients at day 30 (Scr P = 0.047, eGFR P = 0.008), day 90 (Scr P = 0.010, eGFR P = 0.005), and month 9 (eGFR P = 0.008), and recipients from secretor donors had a lower incidence of graft rejection in the first year after ABOi transplantation (P = 0.004). Conclusions: A weak secretor status phenotype was found in both genotypes, i.e., individuals who secreted soluble antigens as well as those who did not. The recipient ABH-secretor status may have an influence on early posttransplant renal function, and the donor ABH-secretor status might affect the incidence of graft rejection.

Lung Transplantation and the Era of the Sensitized Patient.

Long term outcomes in lung transplant are limited by the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Within the past several decades, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has been recognized as a risk factor for CLAD. The presence of HLA antibodies in lung transplant candidates, "sensitized patients" may predispose patients to AMR, CLAD, and higher mortality after transplant. This review will discuss issues surrounding the sensitized patient, including mechanisms of sensitization, implications within lung transplant, and management strategies.

Management of Donor-Specific Antibodies in Haploidentical Transplant: Multicenter Experience From the Madrid Group of Hematopoietic Transplant.

Background: Donor specific antibodies (DSAs) can be responsible for graft failure (GF) in the setting of mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The aim of our study is to report the experience of the Madrid Group of Hematopoietic Transplant (GMTH) in patients with DSAs undergoing haplo-HSCT. Methods: Patients undergoing haplo-HSCT in centers from the GMTH from 2012 to 2020 were included in the study. DSAs were analyzed with a solid-phase single-antigen immunoassay; monitoring was performed during desensitization on days -14, -7, 0 and in a weekly basis until neutrophil engraftment. Desensitization strategies varied depending on center experience, immunofluorescence intensity, complement fixation and type of antibodies. Results: We identified a total of 20 haplo-HSCT in 19 patients performed with DSAs in 5 centers. 10 (53%) patients presented anti-HLA class I DSAs (6 of them with > 5000 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI)), 4 (21%) presented anti-HLA class II (1 with > 5000 MFI) and 5 (26%) presented both anti-HLA class I and II (5 with > 5000 MFI). 90% of patients received at least two treatments as desensitization strategy and all experienced a decrease of MFI after desensitization (mean reduction 74%). Only one patient who developed progressive increase of MFI after infusion developed GF. Desensitization treatments used included rituximab, immunoglobulins, therapeutic plasma exchange, incompatible platelets, buffy coat and immunosuppressors. Seventeen (90%) patients achieved neutrophil engraftment; one patient died before engraftment because of infection and one patient with class I DSAs developed primary GF despite an intensive desensitization. After a median follow-up of 10 months, OS and EFS were 60% and 58%, respectively, cumulative incidence of relapse was 5% and NRM was 32%. Conclusions: Despite the optimal strategy of DSAs desensitization remains unclear, the use of desensitization treatment guided by DSAs intensity kinetics constitute an effective approach with high rates of engraftment for patients with DSAs in need for an haplo-HSCT lacking an alternative suitable donor.

Impaired renal function before kidney procurement has a deleterious impact on allograft survival in very old deceased kidney donors.

As the use of elderly kidney donors for transplantation is increasing with time, there is a need to understand which factors impact on their prognosis. No data exist on the impact of an impaired renal function (IRF) in such population. 116 kidney recipients from deceased kidney donors over 70 years were included from 2005 to 2015 in a single-center retrospective study. IRF before organ procurement was defined as a serum creatinine above 1.0 mg/dl or a transient episode of oligo-anuria. Mean ages for donors and recipients were respectively 74.8 ± 3.5 and 66.7 ± 8.0. Graft survival censored for death at 5 years was of 77%. Using a multivariate analysis by Cox model, the only predictor of graft loss present in the donor was IRF before organ procurement (HR 4.2 CI95[1.8-9.7]). IRF was also associated with significant lower estimated glomerular filtration rates up to 1 year post-transplantation. By contrast, KDPI score (median of 98 [96-100]), was not associated with the risk of graft failure. Then, IRF before kidney procurement may define a risk subgroup among very-old deceased kidney donors, in whom pre-implantatory biopsies, dual kidney transplantation or calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppressive regimen could help to improve outcomes.

Impact of Anesthesiologist Experience on Early Outcomes in Adult Orthotopic Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation is a complex surgical procedure. The experience of the anesthesiologist, and its potential relationship to patient morbidity and mortality, is yet to be determined. We sought to explore this possible association using our institutional training patterns as the subject of study. METHODS: This is a single center retrospective analysis investigating the association of an anesthesiologist's experience with liver transplantation and its potential effect on early patient outcomes in adult liver transplant recipients from January 2010 to September 2016. Training of team members consisted of a 6-month period of clinical shadowing with a senior anesthesiologist and co-staffing 8 liver transplant procedures before solo staffing a liver transplant. Specifically, patient outcomes for the first 5 transplants after this training were investigated. RESULTS: The only independent risk factor for early death or early graft loss was the amount of packed red blood cells administered during transplantation. With respect to secondary outcomes, the amount of packed red blood cells and hospitalization at the time of transplant were associated with the number of days on a ventilator, length of intensive care unit stay, and overall hospital length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study conclude that the training model currently in place for our new team members has no negative impact on patient outcomes after liver transplantation.

Low Pre-Transplant Caveolin-1 Serum Concentrations Are Associated with Acute Cellular Tubulointerstitial Rejection in Kidney Transplantation.

Acute and chronic transplant rejections due to alloreactivity are essential contributors to graft loss. However, the strength of alloreactivity is biased by non-immunological factors such as ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI). Accordingly, protection from IRI could be favorable in terms of limiting graft rejection. Caveolin-1 (Cav-1) is part of the cell membrane and an important regulator of intracellular signaling. Cav-1 has been demonstrated to limit IRI and to promote the survival of a variety of cell types including renal cells under stress conditions. Accordingly, Cav-1 could also play a role in limiting anti-graft immune responses. Here, we evaluated a possible association between pre-transplant serum concentrations of Cav-1 and the occurrence of rejection during follow-up in a pilot study. Therefore, Cav-1-serum concentrations were analyzed in 91 patients at the time of kidney transplantation and compared to the incidence of acute and chronic rejection. Higher Cav-1 levels were associated with lower occurrence of acute cellular tubulointerstitial rejection episodes.

Impact of the immunotherapy induction on allograft outcome and survival in kidney transplant patients with donor-specific antibodies to HLA-DQB1.

BACKGROUND: The presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) against HLA-DQB1 is considered a significant barrier to good outcome and allograft survival in kidney transplantation (KT). This study aimed to assess the impact of induction immunotherapy on the outcome and allograft survival in KT patients with HLA-DQB1-DSA. METHODOLOGY: Thirty-two patients who had undergone KT and found to be positive for HLA-DQB1-DSA were monitored at least one to 10 years. They were allocated into two groups of patients: G1 received induction immunotherapy (n = 14 patients; 43.75%), and G2 did not (n = 18 patients; 56.25%). RESULTS: In G1, 6 (42.86%) patients experienced rejection episodes (RE), 2 (14.29%) due to antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and 4 (28.57%) due to T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). In G2, 13 (72.22%) patients experienced RE, 3 (16.67%) due to ABMR, and 10 (55.56%) due to TCMR. Graft loss occurred in 4 patients from G1, 2 (14.29%) due to ABMR and 2 (14.29%) due to non-immunological causes. In G2, 9 (50.00%) patients lost their grafts, 2 (11.11%) due to TCMR, 2 (11.11%) due to ABMR, and 5 (27.78%) due to non-immunological causes. The graft survival rate was 64.29% in G1 and 45.83% in G2. Glomerulitis and peritubular capillaritis were observed in 3 and C4d-positive patients with/or without induction who lost their grafts by ABMR by HLA-DQ DSA. Two patients from G2 lost their graft by TCMR due to interstitial lymphocytic infiltrate (i1), foci of mild tubulitis (t2), interstitial edema, moderate interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy. Better graft survival rates were shown in patients from G1 who received induction immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that patients with an immunological profile of HLA-DQ+ DSA+ treated by immunotherapy induction have a decreased risk of ABMR and increased allograft survival, and the presence of anti-HLA-DQB1 DSA+ detected before and after KT were associated with ABMR episodes and failure.

Clinical characteristics, risk factors and outcome of severe Norovirus infection in kidney transplant patients: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Human Norovirus (HuNoV) has recently been identified as a major cause of diarrhea among kidney transplant recipients (KTR). Data regarding risk factors associated with the occurrence of HuNoV infection, and its long-term impact on kidney function are lacking. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control study including all KTR with a diagnosis of HuNoV diarrhea. Each case was matched to a single control according to age and date of transplantation, randomly selected among our KTR cohort and who did not develop HuNoV infection. Risk factors associated with HuNoV infection were identified using conditional logistic regression, and survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimator. RESULTS: From January 2012 to April 2018, 72 cases of NoV diarrhea were identified among 985 new KT, leading to a prevalence of HuNoV infection of 7.3%. Median time between kidney transplantation and diagnosis was 46.5 months (Inter Quartile Range [IQR]:17.8-81.5), and the median duration of symptoms 40 days (IQR: 15-66.2). Following diagnosis, 93% of the cases had a reduction of immunosuppression. During follow-up, de novo Donor Specific Antibody (DSA) were observed in 8 (9%) cases but none of the controls (p = 0.01). Acute rejection episodes were significantly more frequent among cases (13.8% versus 4.2% in controls; p = 0,03), but there was no difference in serum creatinine level at last follow-up between the two groups (p = 0.08). Pre-transplant diabetes and lymphopenia below 1000/mm3 were identified as risks factors for HuNoV infection in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: HuNoV infection is a late-onset and prolonged infection among KTR. The current management, based on the reduction of immunosuppressive treatment, is responsible for the appearance of de novo DSA and an increase in acute rejection episodes.

Impacto de la modalidad de diálisis sobre la morbimortalidad tras el fracaso del injerto renal: análisis con eventos competitivos / Impact of dialysis modality on morbimortality of kidney transplant recipients after allograft failure. Analysis in the presence of competing events

ANTECEDENTES Y OBJETIVO: El número de personas que inician diálisis por el fracaso del injerto aumenta cada día. La modalidad de diálisis mejor para este tipo de pacientes no está bien definida y la mayoría de ellos son derivados a hemodiálisis (HD). El objetivo de nuestro estudio es evaluar el impacto de la modalidad de diálisis sobre la morbilidad y la mortalidad en individuos trasplantados que inician este procedimiento tras el fracaso del injerto. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio multicéntrico retrospectivo observacional y de cohortes que compara la evolución de los pacientes que inician diálisis tras el fracaso del injerto, desde enero del año 2000 a diciembre del 2013. Un grupo lo hace en diálisis peritoneal (DP) y otro en HD. Se realizó un seguimiento a los pacientes hasta el cambio de técnica de diálisis, retrasplante o fallecimiento. Se analizaron datos antropométicos, comorbilidad, el filtrado glomerular (FG) con el que iniciaban la diálisis, la presencia de un acceso óptimo para esta, la presencia de intolerancia al injerto y el retrasplante. Estudiamos el motivo de los 10 primeros ingresos hospitalarios tras el inicio de la diálisis. Para el análisis estadístico, se tuvo en cuenta la presencia de eventos competitivos que dificultaran la aparición del evento de interés, muerte o ingreso hospitalario. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 175 pacientes. En DP 86 y 89 en HD. Los individuos que iniciaron DP eran más jóvenes, tenían menor comorbilidad y lo hacían con FG más bajos que los de HD. El seguimiento medio fue de 34 ± 33 meses, con una mediana de 24 (IQR siete a 50 meses), siendo mayor en los pacientes en HD que en los de DP (35 vs. 18 meses, p = < 0,001). Los factores de riesgo que influyeron en la mortalidad fueron la edad (coeficiente del sub Hazard Ratio [sHR] 1,06 (IC 95%: 1,033 a 1,106, p = 0,000), el uso no óptimo del acceso (sHR 3,00 (IC 95%: 1,507 a 5,982, p = 0,028) y el tipo de diálisis, la DP sHR[DP/HD] 0,36 (IC 95%: 0,148 a 0,890, p = 0,028). Los pacientes en DP tenían menos riesgo de un ingreso hospitalario sHR[DP/HD] 0,52 (IC 95%: 0,369 a 0,743, p = < 0,001) y menos probabilidad de desarrollar una intolerancia al injerto HR 0,307 (IC 95% 0,142 a 0,758, p = 0,009). CONCLUSIONES: Con las limitaciones de un estudio retrospectivo y no randomizado, es la primera vez a nivel nacional que se demuestra que la DP en términos de supervivencia es mejor que la HD cuando fracasa el injerto durante el primer año y medio en diálisis. La presencia de un acceso no óptimo para este procedimiento es un factor de riesgo de mortalidad independiente y modificable. La remisión precoz de los pacientes a las unidades de enfermedad renal crónica avanzada (ERCA) es fundamental para que estos elijan la técnica que más se adapte a sus circunstancias y preparar un acceso óptimo para el inicio de diálisis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The number of patients who start dialysis due to graft failure increases every day. The best dialysis modality for this type of patient is not well defined and most patients are referred to HD. The objective of our study is to evaluate the impact of the dialysis modality on morbidity and mortality in transplant patients who start dialysis after graft failure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicentre retrospective observation and cohort study was performed to compare the evolution of patients who started dialysis after graft failure from January 2000 to December 2013. One group started on PD and the other on HD. The patients were followed until the change of dialysis technique, retransplantation or death. Anthropometric data, comorbidity, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at start of dialysis, the presence of an optimal access for dialysis, the appearance of graft intolerance and retransplantation were analysed. We studied the causes for the first 10 hospital admissions after starting dialysis. For the statistical analysis, the presence of competitive events that hindered the observation of the event of interest, death or hospital admission was analysed. RESULTS: 175 patients were included, 86 in DP and 89 in HD. The patients who started PD were younger, had less comorbidity and started dialysis with lower eGFR than those on HD. The mean follow-up was 34 ± 33 months, with a median of 24 months (IQR 7 - 50 months), Patients on HD had longer follow-up than patients on PD (35 vs. 18 months, p = < 0.001). The mortality risk factors were age sHR 1.06 (95% CI: 1.033 - 1.106, p = 0.000), non-optimal use of access for dialysis sHR 3.00 (95% CI: 1.507 - 5.982, p = 0.028) and the dialysis modality sHR (PD / HD) 0.36 (95% CI: 0.148 - 0.890, p = 0.028). Patients on PD had a lower risk of hospital admission sHR [DP / HD] 0.52 (95% CI: 0.369-0.743, p = < 0.001) and less probability of developing graft intolerance HR 0.307 (95% CI 0.142-0.758, p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: With the limitations of a retrospective and non-randomized study, it is the first time nationwide that PD shows in terms of survival to be better than HD during the first year and a half after the kidney graft failure. The presence of a non-optimal access for dialysis was an independent and modifiable risk factor for mortality. Early referral of patients to advanced chronic kidney disease units is essential for the patient to choose the technique that best suits their circumstances and to prepare an optimal access for the start of dialysis

Outcomes of Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients Stratified by Histologic Biopsy Findings.

Delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation is associated with an increased risk of graft failure. We studied the histologic findings among adult kidney transplant recipients transplanted between January 2000 and June 2015 who had DGF and had a kidney biopsy within 14 days of transplant. Death censored graft failure (DCGF) and death at 1 and 3 years after transplant were examined. A total of 269 transplant recipients fulfilled our selection criteria, of which 152 (56.51%) had acute tubular necrosis (ATN), 44 (16.4%) had acute rejection (AR), mainly T-cell mediated rejection (n = 31), 35 (13%) had ATN with AR (mainly T-cell mediated rejection, n = 26), and 38 (14.1%) had other pathology. Compared with those with ATN alone, kidney transplant recipients with AR alone had a significantly higher risk of DCGF at 1 year post transplant (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.70; 95% confidence interval 1.5-9.5; P = .006). Those with AR alone had an increased risk of DCGF at 3 years post transplant (hazard ratio = 3.10; 95% confidence interval 1.3-8.5; P = .01) in crude analyses. There was no association between DGF etiology and mortality. Early renal biopsy can be used to distinguish AR, which has protocolized treatments, from other etiologies. This could potentially alter allograft survival within 1 year of transplant complicated by DGF.

Long-term outcomes after kidney transplant failure and variables related to risk of death and probability of retransplant: Results from a single-center cohort study in Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Returning to dialysis after kidney graft loss (GL) is associated with a high risk of mortality, mainly in the first 3-6 months. The follow-up of patients with GL should be extended to better understand crude patient outcomes, mainly in emerging countries, where the transplantation activity has increased. METHODS: This is a historical single-center cohort study conducted in an emerging country (Brazil) that included 115 transplant patients with kidney allograft failure who were followed for 44.1 (21.4; 72.6) months after GL. The outcomes were death or retransplantation after GL calculated by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Proportional hazard ratios for death and retransplantation were assessed by Cox regression. RESULTS: The 5-year probability of retransplantation was 38.7% (95% CI: 26.1%-51.2%) and that of death was 37.7% (95% CI: 24.9%-50.5%); OR = 1.03 (95% CI: 0.71-1.70) and P = 0.66. The likelihood of retransplantation was higher in patients who resumed dialysis with higher levels of hemoglobin (HR = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.04-1.43; P = 0.01) and lower in blood type O patients (HR = 0.48; 95% CI = 0.25-0.93; P = 0.03), which was associated with a lower frequency of retransplantation with a subsequent living-donor kidney. On the other hand, the risk of death was significantly associated with Charlson comorbidity index (HR for each point = 1.37; 95% CI 1.19-1.50; P<0.001), and residual eGFR at the time when patients had resumed to dialysis (HR for each mL = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.05-1.25; P = 0.002). The trend toward a lower risk of death when patients had resumed to dialysis using AV fistula access was observed (HR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.25-1.02; P = 0.06), while a higher risk seems to be associated with the number of previous engraftment (HR = 2.01; 95% CI 0.99-4.07; P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year probability of retransplantation was not less than that of death. Variables related to the probability of retransplantation were hemoglobin level before resuming dialysis and ABO blood type, while the risk of death was associated with comorbidities and residual eGFR.